• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    “Coalitional alignment” and a claimed safety guarantee for strategic agents

    A thread describes a condition weaker than requiring each reviewer to share the principal’s exact utility. Under it, the author claims every Nash equilibrium leaves the principal no worse off than baseline.

    AR
    1 Source, 15d ago, first seen 15d ago

    TLDR

    The thread claims that when a driver agent and its reviewers optimize their own long-run discounted payoffs, a non-negative span condition makes every Nash equilibrium safe for the principal—meaning no worse than baseline. A Nash equilibrium is a situation where no agent benefits from changing strategy alone. The author calls the condition “coalitional alignment” and says it is substantially weaker than individual alignment, which would require reviewers to have exactly the principal’s utility.

    Combined views

    303

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    Combined views

    303

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    5 likes
    5 likes
    1 comments
    5 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    5 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @AarothWe call this condition "coalitional alignment" -- it is very similar to the market alignment condition that drives our earlier work: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15090 It is a substantially weaker condition than individual alignment (That the reviewer agents have your utility exactly)

    1 Source

    @AarothWe call this condition "coalitional alignment" -- it is very similar to the market alignment condition that drives our earlier work: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15090 It is a substantially weaker condition than individual alignment (That the reviewer agents have your utility exactly)