A post recalls Noah Brown saying “something like 85%,” but reports he said the swarm’s contribution isn’t really known.
A poster says Noah Brown recently said on the Dwarkesh podcast that it’s not really known how much the swarm contributed. The poster thought Brown had said “something like 85%.”
827
3 Sources, first seen ago
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@AndrewCurran_@DanielleFong OpenAI said this to Scientific American:
@peteskomorochRT @AndrewCurran_: Most of the recent math results were not reached by a swarm, the way Navier–Stokes was. I think that part got lost in th…
@aran_nayebiRT @deredleritt3r: It's somewhat under-discussed *why* OpenAI released only around ~400 math results. The purpose of this exercise was not…@AndrewCurran_@DanielleFong OpenAI said this to Scientific American:@peteskomorochRT @AndrewCurran_: Most of the recent math results were not reached by a swarm, the way Navier–Stokes was. I think that part got lost in th…@aran_nayebiRT @deredleritt3r: It's somewhat under-discussed *why* OpenAI released only around ~400 math results. The purpose of this exercise was not…@AndrewCurran_@DanielleFong OpenAI said this to Scientific American:@peteskomorochRT @AndrewCurran_: Most of the recent math results were not reached by a swarm, the way Navier–Stokes was. I think that part got lost in th…@aran_nayebiRT @deredleritt3r: It's somewhat under-discussed *why* OpenAI released only around ~400 math results. The purpose of this exercise was not…@AndrewCurran_@DanielleFong OpenAI said this to Scientific American:@peteskomorochRT @AndrewCurran_: Most of the recent math results were not reached by a swarm, the way Navier–Stokes was. I think that part got lost in th…@aran_nayebiRT @deredleritt3r: It's somewhat under-discussed *why* OpenAI released only around ~400 math results. The purpose of this exercise was not…
