AI models may be more interpretable than previously thought
Goodfire researcher Nick Cammarata argues that modern tools reveal most neurons as legible in models up to trillions of parameters.
TLDR
In a Goodfire essay, Cammarata calls his argument a working hypothesis. He says an earlier OpenAI project found about 2% of neurons legible with primitive tools, but newer methods paint a different picture. He argues that several famous examples of tangled neurons were misread and thinks automated research could make interpretability more tractable in time to help with AI alignment.
Combined views
78.4K
34 Sources, first seen ago
