• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI

AI safety, GPU sales and the dispute over Nvidia’s motives

Participants disagree over whether Jensen’s AI-risk views can be reduced to GPU sales incentives. One argues that OpenAI and Anthropic sometimes appear to act against their own interests.

Leo GaoLG
7 Sources, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

TLDR

The exchange pits a financial-incentives explanation against a defense of sincere belief. One participant argues that Jensen’s actions are consistent with saying whatever makes him more money, while OpenAI and Anthropic sometimes appear to act against their own interests. They say they have not seen comparable moves from Nvidia. The other rejects dismissing Jensen’s beliefs as merely a GPU sales tactic and argues that existential risk cannot be set aside: whether Jensen genuinely thinks AI doom is implausible is precisely what is disputed.

Combined views

3.1K

7 Sources, first seen 20d ago

144 likes8 comments11 saves4 reposts

Combined views

3.1K

7 Sources, first seen 20d ago

144 likes8 comments11 saves4 reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

7 Sources

Leo Gao@nabla_theta@MatthewJBar @Polymarket if we ignore x-risk, slowing down ai is bad for nvidia and openai and anthropic. but openai and anthropic advocate for slower ai, and nvidia is advocating for faster ai.20d
Matthew Barnett@MatthewJBar@nabla_theta @Polymarket Whereas my claim is that Jensen's actions are *not* consistent with him believing that AI doom is likely but lying about that in order to make a lot of money (presumably for a short time before he dies, along with everyone else).20d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    7 Sources

    Leo Gao@nabla_theta@MatthewJBar @Polymarket if we ignore x-risk, slowing down ai is bad for nvidia and openai and anthropic. but openai and anthropic advocate for slower ai, and nvidia is advocating for faster ai.20d
    Matthew Barnett@MatthewJBar@nabla_theta @Polymarket Whereas my claim is that Jensen's actions are *not* consistent with him believing that AI doom is likely but lying about that in order to make a lot of money (presumably for a short time before he dies, along with everyone else).20d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet