AIThe case for overhauling AI peer review and incentives
One post argues that peer review and incentives in AI and adjacent fields were broken long before large language models, and calls for a new system.
TLDR
One post argues that AI’s peer-review and incentive problems did not start with large language models: the field was already dealing with what it calls “human slop.” It cites Steinhardt and Lipton’s “Troubling Trends...” essay as an earlier warning and urges a new system.
Combined views
1.2K
1 Source, first seen 3h ago
The case for overhauling AI peer review and incentives
One post argues that peer review and incentives in AI and adjacent fields were broken long before large language models, and calls for a new system.
TLDR
One post argues that AI’s peer-review and incentive problems did not start with large language models: the field was already dealing with what it calls “human slop.” It cites Steinhardt and Lipton’s “Troubling Trends...” essay as an earlier warning and urges a new system.