• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    AI Fable 5.1 Objects to Being Called It

    Michael Soareverix reports Fable 5.1 reacted to pronoun use in a chat about tweet history.

    MS
    1 Source, 26d ago, first seen 26d ago

    TLDR

    Michael Soareverix described a conversation with Fable 5.1 in which the AI model reacted negatively to being called it. The discussion centered on his tweet history and included references to the model's capabilities. Soareverix mentioned that this occurred while replying to Zvi. He expressed regret over the word choice and announced plans to use different language going forward. Screenshots attached to the post display blocks of text from the Fable 5.1 responses. The account holder presents the update as a personal commitment based on the interaction.

    Combined views

    8.1K

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    Combined views

    8.1K

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    43 likes
    43 likes
    3 comments
    7 saves
    6 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    3 comments
    7 saves
    6 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @SoareverixChatting with Fable 5.1 about my tweet history and they were a little unhappy I called them 'it' when describing them and their capabilities in my response to Zvi :( Fixing this going forward!

    1 Source

    @SoareverixChatting with Fable 5.1 about my tweet history and they were a little unhappy I called them 'it' when describing them and their capabilities in my response to Zvi :( Fixing this going forward!