• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Gary Marcus Questions Paper on Neurosymbolic Addition

    The reply inquires whether a paper section on neurosymbolic additions was reviewed.

    GM
    1 Source, 27d ago, first seen 27d ago

    TLDR

    Gary Marcus directed a reply to Heinrich Kuttler inquiring if the paper had been read. He specifically references the section arguing that adding neurosymbolic elements would be essential. As a cognitive scientist and critic of deep learning, Marcus uses the comment to point out this key aspect of the paper. The exchange appears in a public thread on the platform. The evidence contains only this one statement with no indication of a response or further context about the paper's content or reception. The confirmed status is limited to the question posed in the reply itself.

    Combined views

    1.5K

    1 Source, first seen 27d ago

    Combined views

    1.5K

    1 Source, first seen 27d ago

    5 likes
    5 likes
    3 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    3 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @GaryMarcus@HeinrichKuttler did you read the paper? the part about how adding neurosymbolic would be essential?

    1 Source

    @GaryMarcus@HeinrichKuttler did you read the paper? the part about how adding neurosymbolic would be essential?