Reactions
30 postsSI 
signüll@signulllone last thing i will say about this (& then i am truly done) cuz i like dean’s writing. but when you visibly now have a giant incentive structure attached to you & expecting ppl to ignore that is like asking ppl to respect your pronouns no matter how complex they are.…
- likes: 484
- replies: 22
- bookmarks: 68
- reposts: 16
BT Bojan Tunguz@tunguz@signulll Hey, that's one of the reasons I like being a solopreneur. For the most part it gets me off the hook with such accusations/implications.
- likes: 17
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 0
- reposts: 0
AN Aran Nayebi@aran_nayebiWhat did you expect would happen if you post a unilaterally bad take of "open weights is decelerationist" and represent a major corporate lab? Retreating isn't the answer -- Take the criticism & learn from it. It's the open source way 😉…
- likes: 113
- replies: 4
- bookmarks: 11
- reposts: 5
AN Aran Nayebi@aran_nayebiThe more minds working on the same hard problem, the better it is for science and rapid development: https://x.com/aran_nayebi/status/2078543386932289755
- likes: 1
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 0
AK Andreas Kirsch 🇺🇦@BlackHC@aran_nayebi He's absolutely right though. How exactly are open-weight model accelerationist for capabilities?
- likes: 7
- replies: 7
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 0
NL Nathan Lambert@natolambertI am a big supporter of Dean’s work but found this somewhat inevitable, sadly. Is the latest example of why it makes me sad to see the vast majority talent go to a few companies that are subject to extreme attention. Need more variance.…
- likes: 419
- replies: 20
- bookmarks: 47
- reposts: 11