/AI4h ago

AI May Create Permanent Underclass With Restricted Agency

--0--
Comments
Original post
bayes@bayeslord#1291inAI

Related to but not in contradiction to the above points: the "permanent underclass" could be a real thing. In better worlds where it’s real it may look more like restricted agency rather than detrimentally restricted income. For most people this will ultimately be fine, our agency is already highly restricted by modern society, but it will require psychological adaptation which might take time and could be painful.

bayes@bayeslord

There will be humans with jobs for a long, long time. What percentage of humanity that will be is an open question. The people who claim the number will be high are overconfident, as are the people who claim the number will be zero. It does seem hard to imagine how humans will contribute on the margin to the knowledge part of knowledge work for much longer. Demand for some things, like doctors, might go down a lot if we have superhuman AI doctors for $20/month + a la carte testing + significantly improved health via better medical technology. However because we cartelize doctors now, we might keep doing it and being a doctor will remain a great profession. Demand for entertainment will probably increase, but the cost of production will go down and the technical need for humans in entertainment has already decreased significantly. However we care a lot about other humans, so maybe we’ll keep caring about them and being an actor will become more lucrative. One way to think about how this might shape up is how many intermediate layers there are in the supply chain between a worker of today and the consumer. For a TikTok influencer there are zero layers. For a doctor, there are zero. For a factory worker there are many. The extent to which a job (a) can be disintermediated, or (b) can be outcompeted or (c) is fungible will probably determine a lot of their outcome. This analysis is quite subtle and this paragraph is not going to do it justice, but the last thing to mention is that this assumes we don’t have precipitous demand side collapse, which could happen if too many people don't work and productivity/government efficiency isn't good enough for UBI/UHI.

11:39 AM · Jun 4, 2026 · 395 Views
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
-
Views
-
Comments
-
Reposts
-
Bookmarks
Expand data
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most ActivityTimeline
VIEWS227BOOKMARKS1LIKES10REPLIES1
bayes@bayeslord

The idea of a permanent underclass implies the existence of a permanent overclass. This presupposes people with more rights, for some relatively unjustified reason. The ultimate reason is always implied or realized violence-backed domination. But perhaps a world with advanced AI is a world with humans that have no justifiable rights to govern, no agreed-upon merit or standing beyond anyone other humans. This isn't going to ever be 100% true but it might become more important to think about. I suspect the moral and practical cases diverge in practice quite a bit here, perhaps rightly so.

bayes@bayeslord

AI diffusion will happen at some speed greater than zero regardless of various potential rate-limiting factors. There are a lot of computers in the world and FLOPs to intelligence exchange rate is the lowest it will ever be. Don’t bet on things coming to a standstill.

3hViews 227Likes 10Bookmarks 1