A July 2026 letter from the UN Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, co-signed by Yoshua Bengio and Maria Ressa, drew fresh attention when Pangram's detector parsed it as mixed authorship and pegged roughly a quarter of the text to machine assistance, even while the overall verdict stayed Mostly Human.
did they not know how to wrap it up?
This is a very bold letter from Maria Ressa and Bengio!
It is historic to see the chairs of the UN Independent International Scientific Panel on AI take such a strong position.
Pangram's interface highlights specific passages it attributes to AI, giving users a visual breakdown rather than a single binary score.
Applying the detector to work from leading AI researchers leaves open how much weight such statistical flags should carry when the authors themselves shape global AI policy.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@teortaxesTex smelled ai written from the start tbh
did they not know how to wrap it up?
@xlr8harder this "Different fields. Same conclusion" has unreal "LLM trying to go hard" stank, no idea what Pangram is thinking here
@teortaxesTex smelled ai written from the start tbh