• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Report

    A two-word endorsement: “He’s right”

    An October 4 quote-post adds only “He’s right” to the post it shares.

    C🤗
    CP
    SC
    3 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    The October 4, 2026, quote-post expresses agreement with a shared post but offers no explanation beyond “He’s right.”

    Combined views

    284.8K

    3 Sources, first seen 3h ago

    1.1K likes

    Combined views

    284.8K

    3 Sources, first seen 3h ago

    1.1K likes
    Today's Rank

    #11

    Today's Rank

    #11

    3h ago
    first seen 3h ago
    61 comments
    425 saves
    130 reposts
    61 comments
    425 saves
    130 reposts

    3 Sources

    @socialcapitalMicrosoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote that a company renting an AI model “essentially pays for intelligence twice”: Once in money, and again in the proprietary knowledge it has to reveal to make the model useful. This mechanism is called the learning loop: every prompt and correction captures some of the company's know-how. That knowledge is distilled and, with a closed model, the provider keeps that information. If your usage data is worth more than the token cost to serve, providers might end up paying you to use their models. The precedent exists: OpenAI created an opt-in program that gives accounts up to 1M free tokens a day on certain models in exchange for training rights on that traffic. Chips can be rented and algorithms can be leaked or distilled, but the prompts and corrections flowing through a model compound privately for whoever holds them.3h
    @chamathHe’s right.2h
    @ClementDelangueRT @socialcapital: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote that a company renting an AI model “essentially pays for intelligence twice”: Once in…1h
    Featured Source

    Sentiment

    Positive21.2%78.8%Negative

    Summary

    Many accounts criticized renting AI models for turning internal data into repeated vendor costs and rival insights, while positive replies welcomed the framing as a strong case for local or open-source alternatives.

    Based on 46 sentiment-bearing replies from 42 accounts across 2 conversations.

    Sentiment

    Positive21.2%78.8%Negative

    Summary

    Many accounts criticized renting AI models for turning internal data into repeated vendor costs and rival insights, while positive replies welcomed the framing as a strong case for local or open-source alternatives.

    Based on 46 sentiment-bearing replies from 42 accounts across 2 conversations.

    3 Sources

    @socialcapitalMicrosoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote that a company renting an AI model “essentially pays for intelligence twice”: Once in money, and again in the proprietary knowledge it has to reveal to make the model useful. This mechanism is called the learning loop: every prompt and correction captures some of the company's know-how. That knowledge is distilled and, with a closed model, the provider keeps that information. If your usage data is worth more than the token cost to serve, providers might end up paying you to use their models. The precedent exists: OpenAI created an opt-in program that gives accounts up to 1M free tokens a day on certain models in exchange for training rights on that traffic. Chips can be rented and algorithms can be leaked or distilled, but the prompts and corrections flowing through a model compound privately for whoever holds them.3h
    @chamathHe’s right.2h
    @ClementDelangueRT @socialcapital: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote that a company renting an AI model “essentially pays for intelligence twice”: Once in…1h