This is an extremely bad take. Science should be open and reproducible. You wouldn’t be able to build a “frontier model” without relying on thousands of published papers
2:28 PM · Jun 7, 2026 · 21 Views
This is an extremely bad take. Science should be open and reproducible. You wouldn’t be able to build a “frontier model” without relying on thousands of published papers
This is an extremely bad take. Science should be open and reproducible. You wouldn’t be able to build a “frontier model” without relying on thousands of published papers which necessarily didn’t go to products.
This is an extremely bad take. Science should be open and reproducible. You wouldn’t be able to build a “frontier model” without relying on thousands of published papers