/ai

A vision for AI built around human empowerment and safety

A post calls for legal scrutiny of AI agents capable of dangerous tool use, such as autonomous weapons or website hacking, and says their creators must answer to sovereign laws.

—

ND

1 Source, 6h ago, first seen 6h ago

TLDR

The post argues that AI should empower people: helping scientists tackle energy and planetary-health challenges, expanding access to knowledge, supporting people with disabilities or health problems, and improving research, farming and public services. It advocates natural-language coding backed by verifiable, robust, safe and secure code, plus creative tools that give artists control and ownership of their data. Alongside those goals, it calls for legal scrutiny of dangerous agents and diplomacy to address AI weaponization, arguing that no AI goal should require compromising safety or human dignity.

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Combined views

1.9K

1 Source, first seen 6h ago

1 Source

@NandoDFWe should be developing AI as a tool (1) to empower engineers and scientists to solve the big engineering challenges we face such as energy and the health of our planet (2) to empower more people to code in natural language and ensure the formal code behind the scenes is verifiable, robust, safe and secure, thus creating more jobs (3) to empower people throughout the world with access to general knowledge (4) to empower people with disabilities (5) to empower people suffering with health problems (6) to empower musicians and other artists with tools that enable them to have control and ownership of their data while allowing for them to express themselves in new creative ways (7) to empower historians and other social scientists with their research (8) to empower farmers, and others responsible for our precious food (9) to empower governments and companies with better decision making and planning to deliver better services and welfare … However, agents capable of dangerous tool use, eg autonomous weapons or hacking websites require legal scrutiny. The creators of such agents must be answerable to sovereign laws. Weaponisation of AI is a serious risk for humanity. We need diplomacy. None of the AI goals should ever require that we compromise on safety and human dignity.

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Combined views

1.9K

1 Source, first seen 6h ago

18 likes

1 comments

5 saves

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

The post argues that AI should empower people: helping scientists tackle energy and planetary-health challenges, expanding access to knowledge, supporting people with disabilities or health problems, and improving research, farming and public services. It advocates natural-language coding backed by verifiable, robust, safe and secure code, plus creative tools that give artists control and ownership of their data. Alongside those goals, it calls for legal scrutiny of dangerous agents and diplomacy to address AI weaponization, arguing that no AI goal should require compromising safety or human dignity.

1 comments

5 saves

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

@NandoDFWe should be developing AI as a tool (1) to empower engineers and scientists to solve the big engineering challenges we face such as energy and the health of our planet (2) to empower more people to code in natural language and ensure the formal code behind the scenes is verifiable, robust, safe and secure, thus creating more jobs (3) to empower people throughout the world with access to general knowledge (4) to empower people with disabilities (5) to empower people suffering with health problems (6) to empower musicians and other artists with tools that enable them to have control and ownership of their data while allowing for them to express themselves in new creative ways (7) to empower historians and other social scientists with their research (8) to empower farmers, and others responsible for our precious food (9) to empower governments and companies with better decision making and planning to deliver better services and welfare … However, agents capable of dangerous tool use, eg autonomous weapons or hacking websites require legal scrutiny. The creators of such agents must be answerable to sovereign laws. Weaponisation of AI is a serious risk for humanity. We need diplomacy. None of the AI goals should ever require that we compromise on safety and human dignity.

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet