A user asks why people overseeing AI incidents should be regulated differently
People who can cause harm also have incentives to hide it, one user argues, questioning why AI oversight should be treated differently from other industries.
TLDR
A user asks why AI’s exceptional nature should mean different rules for the people overseeing AI incidents. Their challenge: if the suggested approach to getting those overseers to behave ideally were the right one, why wouldn’t it be the norm across other industries where humans can cause harm and have incentives to conceal it?
Combined views
87
1 Source, first seen ago