A critique of how AI expertise is judged
A sarcastic post challenges the dismissal of experienced researchers while pundits citing thousands of LessWrong posts are treated as experts.
TLDR
The author cites their own decades in the field, PhD, papers they say changed policy and products they shipped. The post mocks the idea that people with that background have no clue while pundits citing thousands of LessWrong posts qualify as experts.
A critique of how AI expertise is judged
A sarcastic post challenges the dismissal of experienced researchers while pundits citing thousands of LessWrong posts are treated as experts.
TLDR
The author cites their own decades in the field, PhD, papers they say changed policy and products they shipped. The post mocks the idea that people with that background have no clue while pundits citing thousands of LessWrong posts qualify as experts.