• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Stanford Paper Tests Per-Prompt Safety Scaling for AI

    Tweet highlights Stanford paper on scaling safety updates per prompt to limit utility loss.

    RP
    1 Source, 31d ago, first seen 31d ago

    TLDR

    Rohan Paul posted about a Stanford paper that examines safety alignment in language models. The post notes that standard safety fine-tuning alters behavior on every input, often reducing utility. It states the paper finds that applying scaled safety updates to individual prompts recovers much of the performance lost in global tuning. The tweet describes the core issue as safety weights affecting all prompts regardless of content. Paul identifies the work by its generated headline mentioning CLEAR for utility preservation.

    Combined views

    5.4K

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    Combined views

    5.4K

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    36 likes
    36 likes
    5 comments
    17 saves
    12 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    5 comments
    17 saves
    12 reposts
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @rohanpaul_aiSafety alignment usually costs utility because the aligned weights apply to every prompt; New Stanford univ paper finds that scaling the safety update per prompt recovers much of what global tuning gives up. The problem is that a safety fine-tune changes the model for every input. Harmful or not, every prompt now runs through a safer but weaker model. CLEAR, proposed in this paper, leaves the original model frozen. A small gate reads each incoming prompt and decides how much of a separate safety module to switch on. Benign prompts get almost none of it, so they run on the untouched model. – arxiv. org/abs/2608.21278 Title: "CLEAR: Continuous Latent Adapter Routing for Utility-Preserving LLM Safety Alignment"

    1 Source

    @rohanpaul_aiSafety alignment usually costs utility because the aligned weights apply to every prompt; New Stanford univ paper finds that scaling the safety update per prompt recovers much of what global tuning gives up. The problem is that a safety fine-tune changes the model for every input. Harmful or not, every prompt now runs through a safer but weaker model. CLEAR, proposed in this paper, leaves the original model frozen. A small gate reads each incoming prompt and decides how much of a separate safety module to switch on. Benign prompts get almost none of it, so they run on the untouched model. – arxiv. org/abs/2608.21278 Title: "CLEAR: Continuous Latent Adapter Routing for Utility-Preserving LLM Safety Alignment"