Reaction
Liability and extreme-harm prevention for superintelligence companies
A user wants liability that prompts companies to invest in preventing extreme harm without enabling a free-for-all for trial lawyers.
TLDR
A user argues that liability should leave superintelligence companies “a bit anxious” and investing heavily to anticipate and prevent extreme harm. They also warn against rules that harass and weaken the sector.
Combined views
6K
1 Source, first seen ago