• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Geoffrey Irving Welcomes Public AI Team Disagreements

    UK AISI chief scientist replies on X about internal AI research conflicts.

    GI
    1 Source, 26d ago, first seen 26d ago

    TLDR

    Geoffrey Irving, Chief Scientist at the UK AI Security Institute, posted a reply expressing satisfaction that a post reveals internal disagreements among AI teams. He states that teams differ not only on which research may succeed but also on whether specific work counts as positive at all, citing capability externalities. Irving has held prior roles at DeepMind, OpenAI, and Google Brain focused on alignment. The reply appears as a screenshot attached to the visible post on X.

    Combined views

    1.5K

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    Combined views

    1.5K

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    30 likes
    30 likes
    1 comments
    4 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    4 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @geoffreyirvingFinally, I am happy this post broadcasts internal disagreement! Beyond having different object-level takes on which research may work out, different teams will disagree internally on which research is positive at all, due to capability externalities and such.

    1 Source

    @geoffreyirvingFinally, I am happy this post broadcasts internal disagreement! Beyond having different object-level takes on which research may work out, different teams will disagree internally on which research is positive at all, due to capability externalities and such.