• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI

Sonnet 5.5 tops the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index at max effort; xhigh scores 63 versus 68

Artificial Analysis reports per-task API costs of $3.33 at xhigh and $14.19 at max for Sonnet 5.5.

2 Sources, 2h ago, first seen 2h ago

TLDR

Artificial Analysis says Sonnet 5.5 in Claude Code scores 68 at max effort and 63 at xhigh on its Coding Agent Index. It puts per-task API cost at $14.19 versus $3.33, a 77% reduction at xhigh. Max generated 4.8 times as many output tokens and took 3.4 times as many turns; its largest benchmark gain was on Terminal-Bench 4.0, rising from 58.1% to 66.2%.

Combined views

—

2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Combined views

—

2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts
Image: @ArtificialAnlys on X

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlysSonnet 5.5 tops the Coding Agent Index at max effort, while xhigh offers an attractive cost-performance trade-off: 63 points versus 68 for less than a quarter of the cost In Claude Code, @AnthropicAI’s Sonnet 5.5 scores 68 at max versus 63 at xhigh. At $14.19 versus $3.33 per task, choosing xhigh cuts cost by 77% for 5.5 fewer Index points. Max generates 4.8× as many output tokens and takes 3.4× as many turns. It improves all three benchmark scores, with the largest gain on Terminal-Bench 4.0: 58.1% → 66.2%.2h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    2 Sources

    Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlysSonnet 5.5 tops the Coding Agent Index at max effort, while xhigh offers an attractive cost-performance trade-off: 63 points versus 68 for less than a quarter of the cost In Claude Code, @AnthropicAI’s Sonnet 5.5 scores 68 at max versus 63 at xhigh. At $14.19 versus $3.33 per task, choosing xhigh cuts cost by 77% for 5.5 fewer Index points. Max generates 4.8× as many output tokens and takes 3.4× as many turns. It improves all three benchmark scores, with the largest gain on Terminal-Bench 4.0: 58.1% → 66.2%.2h
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet