AI trained on a person’s work doesn’t change its mind like they do, one post argues
One post warns that conviction doesn’t make an opinion fact: someone can argue the opposite view a year later with the same certainty.
TLDR
One post warns against mistaking conviction for fact, noting that someone can reverse their opinion while sounding just as certain. Quoting that warning, another defends “strong opinions, weakly held” and connects the idea to AI trained on a person’s writing, videos or tweets. Its argument: people change their minds in light of new information, but AI trained on their work does not.
Combined views
225.6K
3 Sources, first seen 24d ago