Report
A proposal for optional AI court decisions with appeals to human judges
Pax Machina says Justin Curl proposes faster AI decisions as an option, with human appeals for litigants who lose.
TLDR
Pax Machina says Justin Curl suggests letting litigants choose between a human judge and a faster AI decision, with an appeal to a human judge if they lose with AI. Curl asks whether people would choose AI and whether human judges would agree with its decisions on appeal. If people keep choosing AI and judges keep agreeing with it, he suggests those cases probably don't need human judges.
Combined views
—
2 Sources, first seen ago
