• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Aimless writing and the urge to check it for AI

    One user says the problem isn't whether AI wrote a post, but whether its wandering prose makes readers want to check it with Pangram.

    SK
    NA
    MN
    4 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    A user argues that having readers check a post with Pangram signals a writing problem, not a problem with using AI. They describe AI's tendency to produce “approximate word salad” without making a real point, urging attention to the prose rather than its authorship.

    Combined views

    91.5K

    4 Sources, first seen 17d ago

    likes

    Combined views

    91.5K

    4 Sources, first seen 17d ago

    456 likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    17d ago
    first seen 17d ago
    456
    27 comments
    352 saves
    42 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    27 comments
    352 saves
    42 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    4 Sources

    @menhguinIf people are checking your posts with @pangram , the problem isn't that it was written with AI. The problem is your writing wanders so aimlessly, that you made people want to check. AI has a specific way of reciting approximate word salad, without making a real point.
    @nikesharoraLol. No bro. Was edited using it and realized it stamps it as AI - so not using any AI editors either.
    @mitsuhikoDavid Sacks' complaint about Pangram giving his longform tweet a 100% AI rating motivated me to figure out how it actually works and if you can (easily) edit your way out of it's AI detection. https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/9/14/interpreting-pangram/
    @sebkrierRT @mitsuhiko: David Sacks' complaint about Pangram giving his longform tweet a 100% AI rating motivated me to figure out how it actually w…

    4 Sources

    @menhguinIf people are checking your posts with @pangram , the problem isn't that it was written with AI. The problem is your writing wanders so aimlessly, that you made people want to check. AI has a specific way of reciting approximate word salad, without making a real point.
    @nikesharoraLol. No bro. Was edited using it and realized it stamps it as AI - so not using any AI editors either.
    @mitsuhikoDavid Sacks' complaint about Pangram giving his longform tweet a 100% AI rating motivated me to figure out how it actually works and if you can (easily) edit your way out of it's AI detection. https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/9/14/interpreting-pangram/
    @sebkrierRT @mitsuhiko: David Sacks' complaint about Pangram giving his longform tweet a 100% AI rating motivated me to figure out how it actually w…