Reaction
The argument against dismissing writing as 'AI slop' without reading it
A user argues that spotting LLM-edited writing is no substitute for reading it and thinking critically.
TLDR
A user says real AI slop exists and can be annoying, but argues that calling something “AI slop” without reading its substance shuts down discussion. Recognizing that an LLM helped edit writing, they say, doesn’t remove the need to read and think critically.
Combined views
—
1 Source, first seen ago
