Moondream CTO argues LLMs should handle code testing · Digg

/TECH

Moondream CTO argues LLMs should handle code testing

The debate started after a researcher skipped unit tests.

Combined views

627

2 posts, first seen 4h ago

15 likes

Moondream CTO argues LLMs should handle code testing

The debate started after a researcher skipped unit tests.

Commentary on X

Highest ranked

Lucas Beyer (bl16)@giffmanaTECH

Combined views

627

2 posts, first seen 4h ago

15 likes2 comments

2 comments

Sentiment

Positive100%0%Negative

Positive Read

Users agree Vikhyatk is right to question LLMs handling code testing because outputs must be examined rather than assumed correct.

Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.

Commentary on X

Highest ranked

Lucas Beyer (bl16)@giffmanaTECH

@vikhyatk Oh you are absolutely right to push back on this. I should have looked at the outputs in this unit test. And i shouldn't have just assumed resume after crash will work without testing. Thank you for keeping me honest.

vik@vikhyatkTECH

@giffmana testing? isn't that the llm's job...?

@vikhyatk Oh you are absolutely right to push back on this. I should have looked at the outputs in this unit test. And i shouldn't have just assumed resume after crash will work without testing. Thank you for keeping me honest.

vik@vikhyatkTECH

@giffmana testing? isn't that the llm's job...?

Sentiment

Positive100%0%Negative

Positive Read

Users agree Vikhyatk is right to question LLMs handling code testing because outputs must be examined rather than assumed correct.

Based on 1 visible X reactions from 1 accounts; directional sample.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.