• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Using a search index to help AI understand queries

    Weaviate Podcast highlights a mattress-search example: “Purple” can be a brand or a color, and it says an LLM plus an aggregation over the underlying data can settle the meaning.

    CS
    WP
    2 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    Weaviate Podcast describes an approach discussed in episode 133: extract entities from a query, check what exists in the search index and how it relates, then feed that context back before running the search. It frames this as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for query interpretation, followed by RAG on the results. The podcast also says the guests debate whether agentic search loops reduce the need for ever-better embedding models.

    Combined views

    329

    2 Sources, first seen 14d ago

    Combined views

    329

    2 Sources, first seen 14d ago

    5 likes
    14d ago
    first seen 14d ago
    5 likes
    2 saves
    4 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    2 saves
    4 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @weaviatepodcast"Think of your index as a language model that is perfectly fine-tuned to your data." Trey Grainger (@treygrainger) grounds LLM query understanding in the search index itself: extract the entities in a query, check what actually exists and how it relates, and feed that back before the real search runs. RAG for query interpretation, then RAG on the results. 🔎 Doug Turnbull (@softwaredoug) likes the example of Purple, a brand and a color at once, where one aggregation over your own data plus an LLM settles which mattress the shopper means. 🧠 Later in the episode they debate whether agentic search loops reduce the need for ever-better embedding models, and get into coding agents reshaping their work. Hear the whole thing on Weaviate Podcast #133: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnQv_wBzUa4
    @CShorten30RT @weaviatepodcast: "Think of your index as a language model that is perfectly fine-tuned to your data." Trey Grainger (@treygrainger) gro…

    2 Sources

    @weaviatepodcast"Think of your index as a language model that is perfectly fine-tuned to your data." Trey Grainger (@treygrainger) grounds LLM query understanding in the search index itself: extract the entities in a query, check what actually exists and how it relates, and feed that back before the real search runs. RAG for query interpretation, then RAG on the results. 🔎 Doug Turnbull (@softwaredoug) likes the example of Purple, a brand and a color at once, where one aggregation over your own data plus an LLM settles which mattress the shopper means. 🧠 Later in the episode they debate whether agentic search loops reduce the need for ever-better embedding models, and get into coding agents reshaping their work. Hear the whole thing on Weaviate Podcast #133: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnQv_wBzUa4
    @CShorten30RT @weaviatepodcast: "Think of your index as a language model that is perfectly fine-tuned to your data." Trey Grainger (@treygrainger) gro…