Thanks!!
1. I think the question is where the surplus of the boom will land. If Europe consumes AI mostly as imported services, the profits might land on US providers while the labour disruption hits in europe. There's also this post from @lugaricano which is worth reading about the risks of growth somewhere else https://www.siliconcontinent.com/p/r-without-g
2. On treating Europe as a single unit. There is big variance between member states which we mostly flattened for the story which is a fair criticism. Denmark is a super interesting case: flexicurity is built for fast reallocation, and it would likely outperform on managing transitions. We also highlight Denmark's model in the summary (https://europe2031.ai/summary). On buy-European: agreed it would face serious resistance, the scenario reflects the France version of that push and the friction it generates.
3. On ASML's defensibility, it's hard to tell. The moat is machine + suppliers + tacit knowledge so I think it's pretty defensible but you're right that, if AI is compressing R&D cycles, EUV might become harder to defend. Which makes it even more important for Europe to invest much more in innovation everywhere in the stack.