• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Astra reportedly shows similar accuracy on division and multiplication in a small test

    A user reports 99.2% versus 97.5% accuracy with a sample of about 2,000, but cautions that their test code could contain errors.

    Leo BoytsovLB
    1 Source, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

    TLDR

    A user testing Astra on division and multiplication reported similar accuracy—99.2% versus 97.5%—in a small sample of about 2,000. They suggested small-sample bias or division involving smaller numbers overall as possible explanations for the slight difference. They also cautioned that their code could contain errors, saying it seemed correct at first glance.

    Combined views

    21

    1 Source, first seen 20d ago

    Combined views

    21

    1 Source, first seen 20d ago

    1 comments
    1 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    Leo Boytsov@srchvrsI just tried both division & multiplication with a small sample (about 2K). For Astra and the accuracy is quite similar. It was even slightly higher : 99.2% vs 97.5%.. There are two explanations: 1. A small-sample bias 2. Buut with division though, the model has to deal with smaller number overall. PS: errors are always possible due to vibe-coding lol, but the code is just a couple 100 LOCs and seems to be correct at a first glance.20d

    1 Source

    Leo Boytsov@srchvrsI just tried both division & multiplication with a small sample (about 2K). For Astra and the accuracy is quite similar. It was even slightly higher : 99.2% vs 97.5%.. There are two explanations: 1. A small-sample bias 2. Buut with division though, the model has to deal with smaller number overall. PS: errors are always possible due to vibe-coding lol, but the code is just a couple 100 LOCs and seems to be correct at a first glance.20d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet