• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

Pangram may be biased toward 100% answers

One user says Pangram called the A–B pair 100% human and the A–C and B–C pairs 100% AI.

David Krueger 🦥 ⏸️ ⏹️ ⏪DK
1 Source, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

TLDR

After trying Pangram on three combinations of sentences A, B and C, a user reported “100% human” for A–B but “100% AI” for both A–C and B–C. They think the tool may favor 100% answers.

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 1h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 1h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

David Krueger 🦥 ⏸️ ⏹️ ⏪@DavidSKruegerI think Pangram is be biased towards 100% answers. I was playing with it a bit and there are 3 sentences A, B, C where is says: A, B - 100% human A, C - 100% AI B, C - 100% AI So that's interesting.1h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    David Krueger 🦥 ⏸️ ⏹️ ⏪@DavidSKruegerI think Pangram is be biased towards 100% answers. I was playing with it a bit and there are 3 sentences A, B, C where is says: A, B - 100% human A, C - 100% AI B, C - 100% AI So that's interesting.1h
    Today's Rank

    #20

    Today's Rank

    #20