Think of yourself as an LLM.
Every social interaction, every meeting, burns your tokens.
Unless someone is a paid subscriber to your attention, you are under no obligation to answer low-quality prompts.
He suggests ignoring low-quality inquiries without prioritized compensation.
Think of yourself as an LLM.
Every social interaction, every meeting, burns your tokens.
Unless someone is a paid subscriber to your attention, you are under no obligation to answer low-quality prompts.
He suggests ignoring low-quality inquiries without prioritized compensation.
Think of yourself as an LLM.
Every social interaction, every meeting, burns your tokens.
Unless someone is a paid subscriber to your attention, you are under no obligation to answer low-quality prompts.
Positive users hail the analogy of treating attention like LLM tokens to filter interactions as the best ever, while negative users dismiss it as stupid, narcissistic, and antisocial.

@Yuchenj_UW Good instinct. But here’s where i would gently push back …

Think of yourself as an autonomous agent.
Every social interaction, every meeting, consumes your compute budget.
You have a finite number of reasoning steps per day.
Don't waste them on tasks with no clear objective, no reward signal, and no feedback loop.
Unless someone is explicitly in your task queue, you are under no obligation to context-switch for low-priority interrupts.

@Dommcming @Yuchenj_UW #Bitcoin looks like common sense now. That wasn’t the consensus when it was worth less than a dollar. That’s the difference I’m interested in.

@Yuchenj_UW so should i send an invoice for the coworker who asked me how my weekend was

@lefthanddraft You're absolutely right!

@InvincibleEdge banger

@Yuchenj_UW Attention is all they need from you

I love this analogy; I think about it often. Not only are we burning tokens, but spending time with people is also a constant fine-tuning of your "model", so be careful who you spend the most time with. You don't want to heavily distill on bad data.
Similarly, if you spend time with the people who are genuinely way smarter than you, you will eventually distill their data too.
Also, we have a responsibility to the people around us this way, and we want to share our best data for their fine-tuning. But also, we don't burn too many tokens on closed training "models".
I could keep going, lol, but it's been a huge life hack. For some reason, when I think of it this way, I can make better decisions with my time, and be more careful with my data distribution.

@Yuchenj_UW !!!

@Yuchenj_UW how do you decide who gets premium tokens?

@Yuchenj_UW that just sounds like your typical engineering role.

@Yuchenj_UW some people treat other humans like free inference endpoints

@MHDOT15 @Yuchenj_UW It's actually commonsense, you know. What you have said.
But ok, never mind ...

@Dommcming @Yuchenj_UW There is. The strange thing is that I started by studying Bitcoin. I ended up studying attentio

@MHDOT15 @Yuchenj_UW There is something in this.
More later.

@Yuchenj_UW context window is finite, protect it

@Yuchenj_UW I think you might be an Anthropic model

@Yuchenj_UW Low-quality prompts get redirected to the 1B model

@Yuchenj_UW ngl calling unsolicited advice a low-quality prompt is the healthiest mindset shift ive seen this month

@Yuchenj_UW Introverts are forced to socialize once.