Very funny part of Anthropic's blog post is how they go "yeah wouldn't a slowdown be nice… but it'd allow the LEAST CAUTIOUS ACTORS to catch up", and the link goes to their Chyna stuff. Guys, you're part of the team that vibe-bombed a girls' school, enough chutzpah please.
Though even funnier is that their «Bad Scenario» which must be avoided at all costs is… uh… 2028 being like 2026. China exists. It has competitive tech. That's about it. I think the actual bad case scenario is that they mobilize and treat the US like they treated the Xiongnu.
Very funny part of Anthropic's blog post is how they go "yeah wouldn't a slowdown be nice… but it'd allow the LEAST CAUTIOUS ACTORS to catch up", and the link goes to their Chyna stuff. Guys, you're part of the team that vibe-bombed a girls' school, enough chutzpah please.
Very funny part of Anthropic's blog post is how they go "yeah wouldn't a slowdown be nice… but it'd allow the LEAST CAUTIOUS ACTORS to catch up", and the link goes to their Chyna stuff. Guys, you're part of the team that vibe-bombed a girls' school, enough chutzpah please.
Many users dismiss Anthropic's warnings that slowing AI development would let China catch up as hypocritical safety ploys meant to cripple competitors and enforce self-serving regulations.
Though even funnier is that their «Bad Scenario» which must be avoided at all costs is… uh… 2028 being like 2026. China exists. It has competitive tech. That's about it. I think the actual bad case scenario is that they mobilize and treat the US like they treated the Xiongnu.
Very funny part of Anthropic's blog post is how they go "yeah wouldn't a slowdown be nice… but it'd allow the LEAST CAUTIOUS ACTORS to catch up", and the link goes to their Chyna stuff. Guys, you're part of the team that vibe-bombed a girls' school, enough chutzpah please.
@teortaxesTex Didn’t you just have a post saying that was not actually their fault?