• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    Doubts about using 256 features to pre-index search data

    A commenter says an approach needing fresh inference on all search data at search time wouldn’t qualify.

    murat 🍥M🍥
    1 Source, 2h ago, first seen 2h ago

    TLDR

    One commenter equates interpretable embeddings with “jev.” In a reply, another says their previous work on classifier-based embeddings isn’t quite the same. They doubt 256 features are enough to pre-index anything, though they say well-chosen features could prove them wrong.

    Combined views

    50

    1 Source, first seen 2h ago

    Combined views

    50

    1 Source, first seen 2h ago

    2 likes
    2 likes
    1 saves
    Featured Source
    1 saves

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    murat 🍥@mayfer@willcb i've worked on classifier based embeddings before.. not quite the same if i need fresh inference on all search data at search time it doesn't qualify and 256 features is not enough to pre-index anything IMO, though i could be proven wrong if someone picks really damn good ones2h

    1 Source

    murat 🍥@mayfer@willcb i've worked on classifier based embeddings before.. not quite the same if i need fresh inference on all search data at search time it doesn't qualify and 256 features is not enough to pre-index anything IMO, though i could be proven wrong if someone picks really damn good ones2h
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet