Ordinary liability law as a tool for reducing AI risk
A post quotes Robin Hanson arguing that sufficient liability incentives for AI owners to avoid near misses would also encourage substantial efforts to avoid worst-case scenarios.
TLDR
A post credits Robin Hanson with making an early argument for using ordinary liability law to reduce AI risk. It quotes him: “So if we gave sufficient liability incentives to AI owners to avoid near-miss scenarios... those incentives would also induce substantial efforts to avoid the worst-case scenarios.”
Combined views
18
1 Source, first seen 2d ago
Ordinary liability law as a tool for reducing AI risk
A post quotes Robin Hanson arguing that sufficient liability incentives for AI owners to avoid near misses would also encourage substantial efforts to avoid worst-case scenarios.
TLDR
A post credits Robin Hanson with making an early argument for using ordinary liability law to reduce AI risk. It quotes him: “So if we gave sufficient liability incentives to AI owners to avoid near-miss scenarios... those incentives would also induce substantial efforts to avoid the worst-case scenarios.”