• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    A post asks whether taking AI existential risk seriously requires being an effective altruist or Yudkowskian rationalist

    “Not necessarily,” the post answers, suggesting those affiliations aren't prerequisites for giving AI existential-risk claims credibility.

    IG
    1 Source, 19d ago, first seen 19d ago

    TLDR

    A post opens a thread by asking whether someone must be an Effective Altruist (EA) or a Yudkowskian Rationalist (YR) to give AI existential-risk claims credibility. Its answer is qualified but clear: “Not necessarily.”

    Combined views

    17

    1 Source, first seen 19d ago

    5 reposts

    Combined views

    17

    1 Source, first seen 19d ago

    5 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @IasonGabrielRT @Dr_Atoosa: Must one be an Effective Altruist (EA) or a Yudkowskian Rationalist (YR) to give credibility to AI x-risk claims? Not necess…

    1 Source

    @IasonGabrielRT @Dr_Atoosa: Must one be an Effective Altruist (EA) or a Yudkowskian Rationalist (YR) to give credibility to AI x-risk claims? Not necess…