/AI3h ago

Xin Eric Wang, UCSB professor and SimularAI research head, argues OpenAI has contributed more to public AI research than Anthropic

AI Judge changed title after evaluation, original title: "Xin Eric Wang, SimularAI head of research, argues OpenAI has contributed more to public research historically than Anthropic"

Wang cited OpenAI's releases of GPT-2, CLIP, and Codex.

33336302616.1K
Original post
Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk#407inAI

If you really think about it, despite being mocked as “ClosedAI,” OpenAI has contributed enormously to the field: GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, CLIP, the ChatGPT paper, the GPT-4 Technical Report, the Sora technical blog, and even open-sourced Codex.

Anthropic, meanwhile, has contributed far less to the public research ecosystem while increasingly promoting fear-based narratives and restricting access through heavy gatekeeping.

The world I least want to live in is one where the future of AI is controlled by companies that prioritize secrecy, gated access, and centralized control over openness, reproducibility, and scientific progress.

2:16 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 13.3K Views
Sentiment

Positive users praise OpenAI for releasing models like Whisper, GPT-OSS, and DALL-E plus usable products and open talks, while negative users insult Anthropic as power-hungry and dismiss OpenAI's openness claims.

Pos
45.5%
Neg
54.5%
13 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS1.7KLIKES15
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

@xwang_lk openai hasn’t released much in years but it’s an interesting point.

Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

If you really think about it, despite being mocked as “ClosedAI,” OpenAI has contributed enormously to the field: GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, CLIP, the ChatGPT paper, the GPT-4 Technical Report, the Sora technical blog, and even open-sourced Codex.

Anthropic, meanwhile, has contributed far less to the public research ecosystem while increasingly promoting fear-based narratives and restricting access through heavy gatekeeping.

The world I least want to live in is one where the future of AI is controlled by companies that prioritize secrecy, gated access, and centralized control over openness, reproducibility, and scientific progress.

2hViews 1.7KLikes 15Bookmarks 0
RETWEETS1
Jason Wang@JasonWang140136

@xwang_lk and they had the nerve to educate open sourced models on dictatorship!!!

2hViews 136Likes 2
REPLIES1
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

@xwang_lk well, they aren’t gonna get medal for openness, but ok :)

Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

@GaryMarcus Yes, but I think they started to release a little bit more since last year, such as gpt-oss and codex.

2hViews 213Likes 1Bookmarks 0
Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

@GaryMarcus Yes, but I think they started to release a little bit more since last year, such as gpt-oss and codex.

Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

@xwang_lk openai hasn’t released much in years but it’s an interesting point.

2hViews 766Likes 12Bookmarks 0

@xwang_lk the GPT-OSS models are also fairly decent

Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

If you really think about it, despite being mocked as “ClosedAI,” OpenAI has contributed enormously to the field: GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, CLIP, the ChatGPT paper, the GPT-4 Technical Report, the Sora technical blog, and even open-sourced Codex.

Anthropic, meanwhile, has contributed far less to the public research ecosystem while increasingly promoting fear-based narratives and restricting access through heavy gatekeeping.

The world I least want to live in is one where the future of AI is controlled by companies that prioritize secrecy, gated access, and centralized control over openness, reproducibility, and scientific progress.

2hViews 604Likes 9Bookmarks 0
Andrew Mayne@AndrewMayne

👀

Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

If you really think about it, despite being mocked as “ClosedAI,” OpenAI has contributed enormously to the field: GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, CLIP, the ChatGPT paper, the GPT-4 Technical Report, the Sora technical blog, and even open-sourced Codex.

Anthropic, meanwhile, has contributed far less to the public research ecosystem while increasingly promoting fear-based narratives and restricting access through heavy gatekeeping.

The world I least want to live in is one where the future of AI is controlled by companies that prioritize secrecy, gated access, and centralized control over openness, reproducibility, and scientific progress.

52mViews 513Likes 3Bookmarks 0
Frosty40@FrostForger

@xwang_lk Openai has contributed To ai by releasing usable products and not gaslighting the public nearly as much as the other clown on stage

1hViews 146Likes 2
Hanchi Sun@sun_hanchi

@xwang_lk gpt-oss

1hViews 32Likes 3
Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

@GaryMarcus certainly not. ;D

Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

@xwang_lk well, they aren’t gonna get medal for openness, but ok :)

2hViews 188Likes 1Bookmarks 0
Wajdi 📈@wajdi_bs

@xwang_lk and down the line, companies that used "closed source" as a business model ended up being surpassed by competitors, and dropped by customers opting for open source or transparent tools..... Redis, elastic, HashiCorp, octoberCMS, MongoDB, Movable Type..... the list keeps growing

2hViews 47Likes 2
studious unc@central9dogma

@xwang_lk Meanwhile, Apple has Siri

1hViews 121Likes 1
Andrew Mayne@AndrewMayne

@xwang_lk Whisper alone was a huge game changer.

Not to mention MRC which flew under most people's radar but is a billion-dollar date center optimization protocol they open sourced:

https://openai.com/index/mrc-supercomputer-networking/

55mViews 28Likes 2
Rogu@RomanGuy20

@xwang_lk Yes.

Appearing vs. being.

2hViews 67Likes 1
LIKA@lika_build

@xwang_lk Totally agree. And also the talents coming out from OpenAI with open speeches. That’s why I want to build more community in the Bay area let people share. If we do not open model, we can open our opinions.

1hViews 52Likes 1
Zhiwei@lian75864

@xwang_lk Fuck Anthropic

1hViews 49Likes 1
Epstein's Stylist@epstein_stylist

@xwang_lk This only makes sense if you genuinely don't think much of AI risks

1hViews 125
i miss the sun@1_missthesun

@xwang_lk or maybe, they are good people, and know there are people who won't do correct things, and take it upon themselves? there is no 'what anthropic is doing is good or bad'. it's simply: they are good, what they are doing makes sense. they are bad, what they are doing is dystopian.

1hViews 69
Xin Eric Wang@xwang_lk

@PMinervini yeah, they are! and DALLE.

2hViews 12Likes 1

@xwang_lk I wonder what crosses Elon mind regarding this situation

He was always pro ai research that is open but at the same time now anthropic is a customer.. and he is always suspiciously quiet on this matter

1hViews 28
Load more posts