Reaction
Is the White House Accord on Super Intelligence more than voluntary self-policing?
David Sacks argues audits and board oversight give the voluntary accord force; Gary Marcus says it isn't legally binding.
TLDR
Sacks argues that although companies enter the accord voluntarily, auditors can report safety issues to board committees, directors have a duty not to disregard them, and existing laws still apply to public claims companies fail to keep. Marcus counters that the accord is “morally binding,” not legally binding, and says criticism of it isn't limited to Democrats.
Combined views
3K
2 Sources, first seen 1h ago