I’m sick of reading AI slop, so today I’m open-sourcing my /no-ai-slop skill that removes 20+ slop patterns from any piece of writing. 📌 Get the free skill here: https://github.com/petergyang/no-ai-slop If you find it useful, please consider starring the repo so more people can find it. Why I built the skill: I use AI to edit my writing because it helps me fix spelling, grammar, and clarity. But even the best models keep producing the same slop that this skill removes: → Binary contrasts: “It’s not X. It’s Y.” → Throat-clearing openers: “Here’s what nobody tells you.” → Fake-profound endings: “The future isn’t coming. It’s already here.” Use this skill responsibly. I always write a first draft manually before iterating with AI on edits and I make sure to do another manual pass at the end as well. That’s in contrast to using AI to automate pumping out slop end-to-end. 📌 Read my full post for more on how I try to use AI responsibly to edit without giving into the dark side: https://creatoreconomy.so/p/use-my-no-ai-slop-skill-to-remove-20-ai-slop-patterns
Peter Yang open-sources `/no-ai-slop` to remove AI writing clichés
The tool targets throat-clearing openers and faux-insight setups.
It slots into common AI editing flows without extra setup
The repo supplies SKILL.md rules and eval checks that run on text via Claude Code or similar harnesses, outputting minimal edits plus notes on what changed.
One reply flags a possible new uniformity risk
Christian Szegedy noted that heavy use of the same cleaner could itself become a recognizable style, though no usage data or tests yet confirm how often that happens.
Many users thanked Peter Yang for open-sourcing his tool to remove AI writing slop patterns and voiced excitement about trying it, while some dismissed the tool as ineffective or argued against any AI writing.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@1balasubbiah I made it with Claude and @HyperFrames_