AIAI objections involving God, souls and the nature of the brain
A commenter calls the position that AI should never be built “defensible,” despite disagreeing, and takes the same view of objections involving God, souls and the brain.
TLDR
In a reply, a commenter calls three reactions “totally reasonable” and “defensible,” while saying they disagree with them: that AI should never be built, an objection based on God and souls, and the view that the brain is not a computer but something fundamentally different or quantum mechanical.
AI objections involving God, souls and the nature of the brain
A commenter calls the position that AI should never be built “defensible,” despite disagreeing, and takes the same view of objections involving God, souls and the brain.
TLDR
In a reply, a commenter calls three reactions “totally reasonable” and “defensible,” while saying they disagree with them: that AI should never be built, an objection based on God and souls, and the view that the brain is not a computer but something fundamentally different or quantum mechanical.