• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    Meta-reasoning as a way for AI agents to plan their own computation

    A thread sharing “Thinking Before Thinking” proposes separating task-solving from decisions about where to spend compute: exploring, building on earlier work, verifying it or stopping.

    AG
    9 Sources, 9h ago, first seen 9h ago

    TLDR

    A thread linking to the arXiv work “Thinking Before Thinking” describes meta-reasoning as a way for an AI agent to decide how to use compute while solving a task. It describes a controller that can assess intermediate work and retrieve relevant stored artifacts instead of replaying the full history. The poster claims this approach leads to stronger final outcomes across different models and task domains.

    Combined views

    5.9K

    9 Sources, first seen 9h ago

    Combined views

    5.9K

    9 Sources, first seen 9h ago

    123 likes
    123 likes
    14 comments
    89 saves
    19 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Featured Source
    14 comments
    89 saves
    19 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    9 Sources

    @anirudhg91192/ As agents take on longer and harder problems, execution itself becomes a reasoning problem. At every step, the agent must decide how to allocate compute: Breadth: explore a new direction? Depth: invest further in a promising one? Verification: check or revise existing work? Stopping: is further computation worth it? The longer the run, the more consequential these choices become.

    9 Sources

    @anirudhg91192/ As agents take on longer and harder problems, execution itself becomes a reasoning problem. At every step, the agent must decide how to allocate compute: Breadth: explore a new direction? Depth: invest further in a promising one? Verification: check or revise existing work? Stopping: is further computation worth it? The longer the run, the more consequential these choices become.