• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Andrew Trask Comments on Pentagon AI Flexibility

    Andrew Trask replies to a discussion on Pentagon AI contract preferences, sharing his impression of their desired approach.

    AT
    1 Source, 31d ago, first seen 31d ago

    TLDR

    Andrew Trask, a privacy-preserving AI researcher at Google DeepMind, PhD candidate at Oxford, and founder of OpenMined who created PySyft, posted a reply to @S_OhEigeartaigh. He wrote that he may be misunderstanding the argument and that his impression is the Pentagon wants flexibility in AI systems. Trask described the desired position as closer to a language calculator and farther from a sentient being. The post appears among visible replies on X.

    Combined views

    186

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    Combined views

    186

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @iamtrask@S_OhEigeartaigh Forgive me. Maybe I’m misunderstanding your argument. My impression is that the Pentagon’s position is they want this level of flexibility. Closer to a language calculator, farther from a sentient being.

    1 Source

    @iamtrask@S_OhEigeartaigh Forgive me. Maybe I’m misunderstanding your argument. My impression is that the Pentagon’s position is they want this level of flexibility. Closer to a language calculator, farther from a sentient being.