• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Self-promo

    A COLM 2026 poster explores 'weightless fine-tuning' for personalizing LLMs

    Its presenter says per-user supervised fine-tuning gets expensive when tailoring a model to thousands or millions of people.

    Tuhin Chakrabarty @ COLM 2026TC
    Paramveer Dhillon @ COLM 2026PD
    2 Sources, 2h ago, first seen ago

    TLDR

    In an October 8 invitation to a COLM 2026 poster session, a presenter described “weightless fine-tuning” as an approach to personalizing LLMs without actual fine-tuning. They said supervised fine-tuning is a strong option for one user but gets expensive at the scale of thousands or millions: it requires separate optimization and model or LoRA weights for each user, plus retraining as new data arrives.

    Combined views

    300

    2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    Combined views

    300

    2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    7 likes
    2h
    7 likes
    1 comments
    1 saves
    3 reposts
    1 comments
    1 saves
    3 reposts
    Featured Source

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    Paramveer Dhillon @ COLM 2026@dhillon_pPlease come to our poster today afternoon (session #6) at #COLM2026 on *Weightless Fine-tuning for Personalizing LLMs without actual Fine-tuning* Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is one of the strongest ways to personalize a model to an individual user. (In one of our recent papers with @TuhinChakr and Jane Ginsburg, for example, we used per-author SFT to emulate the writing styles of award-winning authors.) But what if we want to personalize a model to thousands or millions of different authors/users? SFT gets expensive very quickly: - run a separate optimization for each user; - store separate model/LoRA weights for each user; - retrain as new user data arrive.2h
    Tuhin Chakrabarty @ COLM 2026@TuhinChakrRT @dhillon_p: Please come to our poster today afternoon (session #6) at #COLM2026 on *Weightless Fine-tuning for Personalizing LLMs withou…2h

    2 Sources

    Paramveer Dhillon @ COLM 2026@dhillon_pPlease come to our poster today afternoon (session #6) at #COLM2026 on *Weightless Fine-tuning for Personalizing LLMs without actual Fine-tuning* Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is one of the strongest ways to personalize a model to an individual user. (In one of our recent papers with @TuhinChakr and Jane Ginsburg, for example, we used per-author SFT to emulate the writing styles of award-winning authors.) But what if we want to personalize a model to thousands or millions of different authors/users? SFT gets expensive very quickly: - run a separate optimization for each user; - store separate model/LoRA weights for each user; - retrain as new user data arrive.2h
    Tuhin Chakrabarty @ COLM 2026@TuhinChakrRT @dhillon_p: Please come to our poster today afternoon (session #6) at #COLM2026 on *Weightless Fine-tuning for Personalizing LLMs withou…2h