Reaction
A proposal to reshape research publication around clear, interesting work
A poster argues that AI has made publication less reliable as a stamp of correctness or prestige. They propose judging papers regardless of provenance and requiring video talks to show human understanding.
TLDR
In a reply, a poster proposes that publications collect interesting, well-written work rather than serve as stamps of correctness or prestige. Their proposed rules would permit AI use in submissions and in checking technical claims during review, while leaving judgments of novelty, significance and interest to humans. Papers could be rejected for unclear writing or a poor accompanying video talk, regardless of technical merit.
Combined views
23.1K
3 Sources, first seen ago