AIHow do you review a really large trace?
One post recommends focusing on the first upstream failure and making relevant evidence easy to inspect, with details reviewers can expand as needed.
TLDR
For large traces, one post recommends centering review on the first upstream failure, with expandable details that make the relevant evidence easy to inspect. In a follow-up reply, the same author says agents can and should help—but people still need to look at some data themselves.
Combined views
604
1 Source, first seen 12h ago
How do you review a really large trace?
One post recommends focusing on the first upstream failure and making relevant evidence easy to inspect, with details reviewers can expand as needed.
TLDR
For large traces, one post recommends centering review on the first upstream failure, with expandable details that make the relevant evidence easy to inspect. In a follow-up reply, the same author says agents can and should help—but people still need to look at some data themselves.