Arcee AI's Cody Blakeney sparks debate on AI chat-sharing etiquette, prompting creator Cameron R. Wolfe to share his distillation workflow

@code_star usually strongly correlates with someone being candid wrt showing their raw brainstorming process as opposed to someone passing off llm outputs as their own (which trends toward dishonesty)

@code_star Better than them pasting it cause you can also see the prompts. I like

@code_star "heres this dump if you want to probe it, idk what to fully think about it yet" also has an extremely different valence compared to "SEE! CHATGPT/CLAUDE/GEMINI AGREES WITH ME THAT..."

@code_star I do this all the time personally, but sometimes if the convo is too long I'll create another chat and tell the model to explain the useful part concisely to avoid wasting time reading slop

On one hand I hate reading "slop". On the other hand when I get a really good explanation it feels easier to just pass it along than re-explain it myself?

maybe the laziness should be a clue and if I don't understand it well enough to explain it I shouldn't send it to someone.

@code_star Depends it can be insulting like sending you a let me google that for you link. It might be better to just send the summary at the end rather than the whole process

@code_star my ai produces artisanal, curated, profound tokens. your ai produces slop. we r not the same.

- Claude opus 4.8

How do people feel about receiving a conversation link from GPT or Claude, where someone has been using it to figure out a question the pair of you had?

@CharlesDardaman Good point