The case against research authorship for funding or computing support alone
A post cites authorship guidelines from Cambridge, Harvard, MIT, Nature and Science to argue intellectual contributions are essential.
TLDR
Citing research-authorship guidelines at Cambridge, Harvard, MIT, Nature and Science, a post argues that paying someone’s salary or providing high-performance computing without intellectual input is not enough for authorship. It claims that applying those guidelines would leave a long list of prolific principal investigators in machine learning and computational biology with fewer than 10% of the papers they claim to co-author each year.
Combined views
—
2 Sources, first seen ago