The statement separates official corporate views from individual advocacy
Boaz Barak#133
OpenAI’s approach to AI policy and political advocacy, including how we represent our policy views publicly and why we believe AI policy debates should be transparent
https://openai.com/index/our-views-on-ai-policy-and-political-advocacy/
I’m happy OpenAI put out this statement. Personally I really dislike a lot of things I’ve heard about LTF, and I’ve donated in personal capacity to Bores.
This is just a small step and people may still rightly be skeptical, but I hope we can earn trust through our actions going forward. One thing I’ve learned through being more engaged in our policy work lately is that there are so many people at OpenAI both inside and outside Global Affairs who care deeply about how the right policies could help ensure that AGI benefits all of humanity.
OpenAI’s approach to AI policy and political advocacy, including how we represent our policy views publicly and why we believe AI policy debates should be transparent
https://openai.com/index/our-views-on-ai-policy-and-political-advocacy/
The statement separates official corporate views from individual advocacy
Boaz Barak#133OpenAI’s approach to AI policy and political advocacy, including how we represent our policy views publicly and why we believe AI policy debates should be transparent
https://openai.com/index/our-views-on-ai-policy-and-political-advocacy/
Many users criticized OpenAI's AI policy advocacy statement as hypocritical and untrustworthy over alleged SuperPAC ties, while some appreciated the transparency efforts.
