A message to Anthropic leadership: You're not special. Making sure AI goes well is a team effort not a "you effort."
11:34 AM · Jun 9, 2026 · 51.4K Views
Sentiment
Many users criticized Anthropic's AI safety claims as insincere or driven by greed and hubris, while some agreed with the researcher's call for team-based safety efforts.
Pos
17.9%
Neg
82.1%
29 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS4.2KLIKES125RETWEETS4
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
@MediocreInqv2 Don't admit proudly to misleading a population of people who can be doing genuine AI safety research.
8hViews 4.2KLikes 125Bookmarks 2
BOOKMARKS5REPLIES2
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
Why I think this goes against so much of what Anthropic stands for in AI safety: https://www.interconnects.ai/p/claude-fable-5-and-new-ai-safety
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
A message to Anthropic leadership: You're not special. Making sure AI goes well is a team effort not a "you effort."
3hViews 2.2KLikes 14Bookmarks 5
Aditya Acharya@aadityaa_26
@natolambert check this out
7hViews 960Likes 2Bookmarks 1
Jeffcafe, private detective@jeffcafe_
@natolambert I understand the frustration, but one of their stated top priorities has been to avoid irreversible diffusion. You want to access frontier capabilities, you’ve got to be inside the tent soon IMO. I think they should whitelist researchers for now.
7hViews 866Likes 5Bookmarks 1
Paul Kassianik@kass_paul
@natolambert Isn't their whole thing being the only company responsible enough to build AGI and that any other effort (including open-source) is a risk to humanity by virtue of not being run by Anthropic?
7hViews 1.6KLikes 11
The Mediocre Inquisitor@MediocreInqv2
@natolambert Genuine question, how would you approach it as compared to what they are doing?
8hViews 3.1KLikes 6
Eclipse 🌖@ECLresearch
@natolambert Framing safety as proprietary is how we end up with fragmented alignment standards. Who coordinates when every lab runs their own playbook?
8hViews 478Bookmarks 1
Soumyajit Basu@AstonishedRobo
@natolambert It's fine that they wanna prevent distillation attacks but knowingly trying to sabotage people trying to learn is very awful behavior!
7hViews 1.4KLikes 5
Shreshth Saini@shreshthsaini
@natolambert ++++. IMHO, Jensen had the right intuition about Dario and anthropic. I guess now tech bro will look at @OpenAI and @GeminiApp with more sympathy.
8hViews 1.3KLikes 5
Kaidu@xkaidus
@natolambert acting like ur the only ones keeping this thing on the rails is a fast way to derail it
5hViews 577Likes 5
Buddy vanderBuddy@ptntlbyrnths
@natolambert @DimitrisPapail Dario hates the CCP but he wants Ant to be the vanguard party to AI revolution. he’s a Leninist
7hViews 514Likes 4
Danny N@Dan28811564
@natolambert Anthropic team really out here like: “Get ready for our Mythos level model… but only for making hair product websites. Real scientific work? Sorry, too dangerous”
7hViews 550Likes 3
Nyanpasu@NyanpasuKA
@natolambert BAAAAAAAAAAARS
8hViews 403Likes 3
Quinn@QuinnLue__
@natolambert open source is, and has always been, the best approach
6hViews 560Likes 2
Jason Wang@JasonWang140136
@natolambert @MediocreInqv2 well said
8hViews 444Likes 2
Kausik@therealKausik
@natolambert @sama is our last hope.
8hViews 330Likes 2
remigration supporter@william37433186
@natolambert thy are special. they are the smartest and best researchers doing frontier science. youre building tools no one will ever use
6hViews 512Likes 1
sere@npuig5m
@natolambert Seems closed source and hoping a few thousand people are smart enough to harness AI are not going to lead to good outcomes inevitably if they are serious about AI. Just like how communism and big-gov ideologies fail because a small group of humans are not smart enough alone
4hViews 445Likes 1
Hassan Abedi 📚🌿🦉🪬@Hassan_Abedi
@natolambert
7hViews 306Likes 1
RedBedDread@RedBedDread
@natolambert They will apply these prinicpals if they control ASI
Anthropic is the existential threat, not their AI.
7hViews 284Likes 1
Load more posts