Reaction
Paper rejection criticized over a review said to be largely AI-generated and materially incorrect
A post says a paper was rejected on the basis of a negative review the author calls materially incorrect and, citing Pangram, describe as largely AI-generated.
TLDR
The author says a paper was rejected on the basis of a negative review they consider materially incorrect. They cite Pangram for the claim that the review was largely AI-generated.
Combined views
11.3K
2 Sources, first seen 5h ago
86 likes