• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Report

    Jev Router’s cost and latency trade-off with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)

    Agent Arena says Jev Router had similar performance to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) but cost 38% more.

    Arena.aiAR
    Anastasios Nikolas AngelopoulosAN
    5 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    Agent Arena says its tests spanning more than 4,700 real-world agentic sessions found that Jev Router had similar performance to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max), but cost 38% more and had 1.7 times the median model request latency. The router scored +10% on steerability, nearly matching Claude Opus 5.5 (High) at +10.48%. Arena concluded that calling DeepSeek directly offered a better cost-and-latency trade-off.

    Combined views

    15.3K

    5 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    Combined views

    15.3K

    5 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    72 likes
    2h ago
    first seen 2h ago
    72 likes
    20 comments
    17 saves
    1 reposts
    20 comments
    17 saves
    1 reposts
    Featured Source

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    5 Sources

    Arena.ai@arenaWe evaluated Jev Router by @typesafeai on Agent Arena. Our tests spanning more than 4,700 real-world agentic sessions show: 1. Jev Router does not improve on the current Pareto frontier. For similar performance as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max), the solution costs 38% more and its median model request latency is 1.7x higher. 2. However, it does mostly route to Pareto efficient models. The most LLM it picks is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Luna also being frequent choices. 3. Jev Router’s key strength is steerability. Its score of +10% almost matches Claude Opus 5.5 (High) (+10.48). This highlights the benefit of Jev effectively routing to stronger LLM in response to user feedback. More insights in the thread below.2h
    Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos@ml_angelopoulosStep 1: Make a router Step 2: Make a ton of noise on social media Step 3: Profit Step 4: Test the router Step 5: It is not on the pareto frontier1h

    5 Sources

    Arena.ai@arenaWe evaluated Jev Router by @typesafeai on Agent Arena. Our tests spanning more than 4,700 real-world agentic sessions show: 1. Jev Router does not improve on the current Pareto frontier. For similar performance as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max), the solution costs 38% more and its median model request latency is 1.7x higher. 2. However, it does mostly route to Pareto efficient models. The most LLM it picks is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Luna also being frequent choices. 3. Jev Router’s key strength is steerability. Its score of +10% almost matches Claude Opus 5.5 (High) (+10.48). This highlights the benefit of Jev effectively routing to stronger LLM in response to user feedback. More insights in the thread below.2h
    Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos@ml_angelopoulosStep 1: Make a router Step 2: Make a ton of noise on social media Step 3: Profit Step 4: Test the router Step 5: It is not on the pareto frontier1h