/AI19h ago

Sam Altman and US officials discuss proposal for sovereign wealth fund to hold equity stakes in AI companies

Dividends would be distributed directly to American citizens.

2522.1K703392557.9K
Original post
Jeff Stein@jstein_star

SCOOP: US officials have had talks about having government acquire shares in AI giants, sources say

Altman has discussed w/ senior officials, including Trump. Did again recently

May be *ceding* shares to USG - not a purchase

Shares could go 2 dividend

https://www.notus.org/technology/trump-ai-stake-openai

3:43 PM · Jun 4, 2026 · 476.4K Views
Sentiment

Users oppose Trump administration plans for government ownership in OpenAI and similar companies, viewing it as a move toward authoritarianism that undermines trust, though some favor it if modeled after a sovereign wealth fund.

Pos
11.5%
Neg
88.5%
25 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS71.5KBOOKMARKS139LIKES1.4KRETWEETS475REPLIES46

🚨This is how you turn a crash into a great depression. This is a public bailout of the worst bubble in history. “It’s a concept out there that’s so much money and it’s so big… where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies… the American people can benefit from the success of AI and by doing that they’re going to like it better…”

16hViews 71.5KLikes 1.4KBookmarks 139
Jeff Stein@jstein_star

Bernie Sanders has cited AI safety experts in arguing a partial turnover of equity is inadequate - what’s needed is the government controlling +50% of the AI giants

Bannon agrees:

3dViews 9.5KLikes 66Bookmarks 15
Jeff Stein@jstein_star

Having the government acquire shares of OpenAI or other AI giants would be an enormous shift

Altman is floating only a portion of shares

Idea would be to make OpenAI benefits more broadly felt while retaining control over the company

3dViews 12.6KLikes 45Bookmarks 7
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

FT: The proposal suddenly of a sovereign-wealth-style fund got more attention inside the White House after Sam Altman visited Capitol Hill this week.

The likely mechanism is that AI firms donate a small slice of equity into a public wealth fund, and that fund passes gains to Americans through accounts or dividends rather than the government directly running the companies.

This would differ from the $9B stake the Trump administration took in Intel last year, because people would hold shares individually instead of the US govt owning equity directly.

---

ft .com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6a00

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

FT: Trump administration, OpenAI discussing possible government stake in the AI startup.

OpenAI has already floated a Public Wealth Fund, which would hold long-term assets and potentially pass AI-related gains back to citizens. It will be a government-backed vehicle outside the company.

OpenAI said the fund could “invest in diversified, long-term assets” and would enable citizens to participate in the “upside” of AI growth, possibly by receiving the fund’s returns directly

Theres a huge political angle: voters fear job loss, data-center costs, and corporate control, while AI companies need Washington’s support for infrastructure, procurement, and regulation.

For some context, The Trump administration has already taken stakes in Intel, IBM and other quantum and critical mineral companies during the president’s second term.

---

ft .com/content/b1ab6106-77e6-4218-9eb4-e44bd56ca400?syn-25a6b1a6=1

17hViews 5.5KLikes 25Bookmarks 10
Wagie Capital@WagieCapital

@jstein_star Haven’t even done the IPO yet and already looking for a bailout and government backstop

3dViews 1.3KLikes 47Bookmarks 1
Jonathan Allen@alldspeed

@jstein_star 👇

3dViews 5.8KLikes 5Bookmarks 2
Uncle Beef@unclebeefcake

@jstein_star So the tax payer is on the hook if OpenAI shits the bed. Great

3dViews 1.2KLikes 20
J.D. Banker@DadInvest

@jstein_star Ok but if I’m the US government I don’t want the worst one (OAI)

3dViews 1.9KLikes 15
James' AI Takes@JamesTakesOnAI

@jstein_star when bernie and bannon land on the same ai policy, maybe the idea isn’t “bold regulation” so much as “nationalize the datacenter and call it safety.” power grabs wear lab coats now.

3dViews 1.9KLikes 12Bookmarks 1
Kim Eckert🍷@akim_eckert

@jstein_star Government owning shares in companies as routine "investments" is a road map to autocracy & miles away from a democratic republic that believes in free markets. America as we've known her for a great & successful 249 years will cease to be & fail under Trump on her 250 birthday.

3dViews 884Likes 13
Tony Cruz@N0tAnthonyDavis

@jstein_star Only Nixon could go to China, only Clinton could do welfare reform, etc

3dViews 1.2KLikes 4Bookmarks 1
D.mac@worldflood1

@jimstewartson We’re close, so close to 1929

15hViews 219Likes 16
Kwood@RustlersRest

@jstein_star @NOTUSreports Government OR those *inside* government? Recent history would suggest the latter….

3dViews 628Likes 7Bookmarks 1
Bingo@BadCatLoki

@jstein_star @MollyJongFast It’s just full on state communism now.

Congrats MAGA, you’re the communists you’ve been screaming about.

3dViews 571Likes 12
Boback McGuffin@duncanmit

@jstein_star What if the they set up some system where the companies sent a certain percentage of their profits to the federal government every year in quarterly installments? Maybe the states could also choose to tax the companies if they operate in that state.

3dViews 675Likes 7Bookmarks 1
Crepe Supreme@crepesupreme

@jstein_star Worth noting what 'ceding' means. Treasury gets equity without spending appropriations. Once USG holds a stake in OpenAI, breaking up the company or capping compute cuts a government asset. Antitrust enforcement just got a structural conflict of interest built in.

2dViews 359Likes 1Bookmarks 1
Load more posts