• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    The case for institutions in coordinating AI agents

    A post argues that professional norms and dispute-resolution systems could give AI agents shared rules to draw on, rather than working out agreements in every interaction.

    RL
    1 Source, 16d ago, first seen 16d ago

    TLDR

    A post argues that coordinating multiple agents should be a priority for artificial general intelligence (AGI). It frames the choice as agents working out agreements and “rules of the road” in every interaction or drawing on shared coordination infrastructure across domains. That infrastructure, it argues—such as professional norms and dispute-resolution systems—is what institutions provide.

    Combined views

    1.6K

    1 Source, first seen 16d ago

    Combined views

    1.6K

    1 Source, first seen 16d ago

    39 likes
    39 likes
    7 comments
    8 saves
    4 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    7 comments
    8 saves
    4 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @ryan_t_lowethe most basic case for why "institutions" are important for AGI: 1. it's now clear we need to prioritize multi-agent coordination 2. either agents will re-derive which agreements / "rules of the road" make sense in every interaction, or there will be some kind of "coordination infrastructure" that they can draw on in different domains; eg professional norms, systems for dispute resolution, etc 3. "coordination infrastructure" is just another name for institutions

    1 Source

    @ryan_t_lowethe most basic case for why "institutions" are important for AGI: 1. it's now clear we need to prioritize multi-agent coordination 2. either agents will re-derive which agreements / "rules of the road" make sense in every interaction, or there will be some kind of "coordination infrastructure" that they can draw on in different domains; eg professional norms, systems for dispute resolution, etc 3. "coordination infrastructure" is just another name for institutions